If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. At around 21:40 on October 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent a report that the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was a person, who was a police officer assigned to the Busan Hab Police Station C District, without calculating his/her position; and (b) was able to use the victim’s patroler D (30 years of age) who was a police officer assigned to the Busan Haban Police Station C District as a police officer, who was called the Defendant at the Busan Haban Police Station C district; (c) was able to pay the drinking value and return home; and (d) was able to have other customers, the Defendant openly insulting the victim at the location where the Defendant was located.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, at the temporary location under the preceding paragraph, took a bath to the police officer as stipulated in the preceding paragraph, and obstructed the Defendant’s bar business by force by granting credit cards exceeding the limit to the victim E (the 50-year old-age-old), the main business owner demanding the payment of the drinking value to the victim E (the 50-year-old-old-age-old-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-age-old-her-her-her-year-old-her-year-old-her-year-old-her-year-old-her-year-old-her-old-

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A complaint filed in D;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.