All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence of the lower court against the Defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In light of the content, the crime of this case is deemed disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the responsibility for the crime is very heavy.

However, the circumstances favorable to the defendant are also recognized, such as the defendant's confession of the facts charged in the instant case and reflects the truth in depth, and there is no criminal history exceeding the fine.

On the other hand, under our criminal litigation law taking the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, where there exists a unique area of the first instance court's sentencing determination, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court's judgment, and the first instance court's sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The favorable or unfavorable circumstances against the recognized defendant do not constitute a special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the sentence of the court below was sentenced, and it does not seem that the court's punishment against the defendant is too unfavorable or too unreasonable, taking into account all the circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, and environment, etc.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.