화물자동차 등록 명의이전
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. The reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is that of the court of first instance except for an additional determination under paragraph (3) as to the assertion emphasized by the defendant by filing an appeal, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(2) The grounds for appeal by the Defendant do not differ significantly from the allegations in the judgment of the first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance are recognized as legitimate). 2. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff is obliged to pay to the Defendant the management fee equivalent to KRW 253,000 per month in accordance with the entrusted management contract of this case, since it was operated without actually returning the vehicle
However, from September 2001 to July 79, 2008, the Plaintiff unpaid KRW 19,975,571 in total for management expenses for the period from September 2001, and the Defendant cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim until he receives the management expenses.
[On the other hand, the defendant asserts in the reference document that the plaintiff operated the motor vehicle of this case at the time of January 20, 204 and the present operation of the motor vehicle of this case must be confirmed. However, the defendant's obligation to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration of this case was caused by the termination of the above entrusted management contract of this case, and the defendant is the person who is the defendant (the first instance court's reply as of February 18, 2019), and the operation of the motor vehicle of this case is irrelevant to the defendant's obligation to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration of this case, and the above argument is without merit. The above argument is without merit, taking into account the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by taking into account the following facts and circumstances, it cannot be deemed that the defendant has a claim equivalent to the management expenses against the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion based on this premise is without merit.
1. The defendant shall pay management expenses from September 2001 to July 2008 from the plaintiff.