beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.14 2018나70099

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

On November 4, 2017, when the insured vehicle C ( QM6) D (GM6) was insured vehicle at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle in front of the bus stops in the front of the bus stops in the Gon-Myeon of the Seoul metropolitan area in front of the Seoul metropolitan area on November 4, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff vehicle") was directly driven by the Plaintiff insured vehicle in front of the bus stops in front of the Seoul metropolitan area in front of the Seoul metropolitan area, the insured vehicle in front of the Defendant insured vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle") (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle") with a shock of the Defendant insured vehicle in front of the opposite direction, and there is no dispute over the insurance money of KRW 1,226,710 paid by the Plaintiff insured vehicle E to the Defendant vehicle in front of the opposite direction. Each entry and image of subparagraphs A through 8 (including the serial number), and the purport

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant accident occurred due to the principal negligence of the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, but that the negligence of the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle should be recognized by 10%, among the damages incurred to the passenger E of the Defendant vehicle, the Plaintiff, the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, subrogated the right to claim damages by subrogation against the insurer with respect to 10% of the portion paid as insurance money. Accordingly, the Defendant asserts that there was a total negligence on the part

In full view of the following circumstances, the accident of this case was caused by the total negligence of the driver of the plaintiff vehicle, and there was no negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle or negligence, and there was no negligence in relation to the accident of this case.

The actual cost of the road in which the instant accident occurred is the center line in yellow. However, the center line is not maintained in front of the three-distance intersection, which is the place of the instant accident, but is the so-called “ virtual center line with a crosswalk installed,” but actually the center line is maintained.