When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 28, 2012, 00:20 on December 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was parked in the front of the victim D’s vehicle parked with a bicycle owned by the victim C on the ground that the conflict with the Dong fee was brought about before the building B in front of the building B; (b) was placed in front of the victim D’s vehicle parked with a bicycle owned by the victim C; (c) was placed in front of the vehicle parked on several occasions; and (d) was placed in front of the vehicle listed on the said vehicle; and (d) was destroyed by the

As a result, the Defendant added the victim C’s bicycle rear broke, transformation machine, chain, etc. equivalent to 157,000 won of repair cost, and damaged the victim FF vehicle’s front glass, vehicle ceiling, and strawer, etc. in excess of 2,705,193 won of repair cost, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C, F, and D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and estimates;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.