Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant was a person who is engaged in driving of BEM car, and was under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.178 percent.
1. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) was committed on October 31, 2014 by the Defendant on the following day: (a) on October 16, 2014, the Defendant was driving the Category of Maz Motor Vehicle owned by the Defendant; and (b) on the roads adjacent to the Jeju City, at the speed of the Korean University, from the two lanes to the
The accident point is a place where a vehicle has a lot of traffic, and signals, etc. are installed on the career section, so the driver has a duty of care to safely drive by examining the career section in detail.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, failed to look at the front side of the damaged vehicle in detail while driving the vehicle in a situation where normal driving of a drinking dog is difficult and failed to find out that the aforementioned damaged vehicle was unable to report signals, etc. and temporarily suspend the same, and caused the back part of the damaged vehicle to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
This shock caused injury to the driver of the affected vehicle D (Nam, 40 years of age) about two weeks, to the son E (V), to the son E (V, 41 years of age) about two weeks, to the son F (V, 13 years of age), to the son F (V, 13 years of age), to the son F (V, 13 years of age) about 2 weeks of the vertebral bones, which requires medical treatment.
2. On the date and time set forth in the above paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the Defendant’s B M& car volume, driving a three km distance from the roads front of the cafeteria in front of the commercial cafeteria in which the Jeju city is linked, and driving a three km distance from the roads front of the Noh-dong GSk Tech in front of the street.
Summary of Evidence
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. Each written diagnosis;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident site and vehicle photographs;
1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Aggravated punishment for specific crimes;