However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) connected the illegal gambling site B or C via the Internet; (b) deposited KRW 1 million with the company bank account (G) in the name of the FF bank account designated at the above gambling site in the name of the Defendant; and (c) collected corresponding game money; and (d) received money from the above website in the manner of displaying the result of real-time games, such as Laas, which are in progress at the above website, or various sports games conducted at home and abroad; and (c) received dividends based on the result, from that time until November 2, 2019 [Attached] up to 647 times in total, including the list of crimes, and deposited KRW 78,190,000 in the Internet gambling.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stuffed the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of H - The details of account transactions, - the request for cooperation in investigation by the website and the delivery of investigative data (in response to the request for cooperation in investigation), search, seizure, verification warrant and reply;

1. Habitualness: In light of the fact that the period, method, frequency, and the crime of the same kind of crime continues to be repeated, the defendant's assertion that the defendant's assertion that the defendant was guilty of making a legitimate P2P investment, and the defendant did not commit any gambling at the illegal gambling site.

2. The following circumstances revealed in full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, ① the Defendant remitted KRW 788,190,000 in total to several financial accounts designated at the Internet gambling site for about one year, as stated in its holding, each of the above financial accounts was used as the account received from members in the Internet gambling site, such as “B” and “C”, and ② the Defendant asserts that the said money was remitted to the purpose of investment, but the Defendant asserts that the specific details of the investment, the profit or loss of the investment, the profit or loss, and the principal.