A. The status of the parties A is the husband of the network G (hereinafter “the deceased”) who died after being treated by the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) and the Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F are the children of the deceased.

B. Around March 2015, the Deceased’s Defendant Hospital’s medical staff member and 201: (a) around March 20, 2015, the Deceased was admitted to the Defendant Hospital on March 20, 2015 as a result of the health examination. At the time, the Deceased explained the symptoms that “if the Deceased is in bad condition, she has a chest and is hidden at a high place;” and the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital verified the Deceased’s change of 1m of ST Section by conducting a physical training test for the Deceased. After that, the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital conducted the blood care test for the Deceased, he/she was diagnosed as “the complete closure of the PLD) and 70% of the heart, and Doctrine’s opinion on hospitalization (LCA). 30% of the Deceased’s opinion on hospitalization at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s 25m of 30% of the 1st century (LC).

At the time of hospitalization, the deceased was 73 years of age, 5.3km, and was in a state where he did not have a chest.

C. Around 16:55, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital administered the Hague 5,750 IU around 17:06 around 16:3,30 IU, 17:06 at around 17:06, and 800 IU around 18:50. At the same time, from around 17:50 to 12.5 mmmmm of Agrayart in order to prevent the blood transfer. During the instant medical procedure, medical professionals at Defendant Hospital discontinued 18:40 at around 18:40, while the Defendant Hospital discontinued 17:5m of the deceased’s blood pressure during the instant medical procedure, at around 17:5m of the blood pressure during the instant medical procedure, the deceased’s troke at the right edge of the instant procedure, and the Defendant Hospital discontinued 18:5m of the deceased’s blood pressure at around 18:50,000, at around 17:44.5m.