However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 18:30 on May 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) boarded a cab near the Southern-gu Ccafeteria; (b) did not speak at the destination; (c) did not fabbling the fab in the south-gu E, Nam-gu; and (d) did so at around 18:55 on the same day.

이에 피고인은 순경 G(22세)으로부터 ‘집이 어디시냐, 요금은 내셨냐’라는 말을 듣자 ‘아들뻘도 안되는 사람이 말투가 싸가지가 없다’라고 말하면서 갑자기 발로 순경 G의 정강이를 1회 걷어차고 왼쪽 주먹으로 순경 G의 얼굴을 1회 때린 후 계속해서 위 F파출소로 들어간 다음 그곳에서 경사 H(41세)로부터 ‘인적사항이 어떻게 되느냐’라는 질문을 듣자, 경사 H에게 다가가 손가락으로 경사 H가 착용하고 있던 안경알을 3회가량 치고는 계속해서 경사 H의 얼굴을 양 주먹으로 2회 때리고, 발로 경사 H의 허벅지를 2회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, G and H

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the degree of damage by police officers who suffered damage is not much serious, and the fact that they resulted in contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol, etc.);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;