2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant led to the crime of this case and reflected against the defendant, agreed with some victims, and the value of the damage caused by the crime of this case is not high.

B. However, the Defendant stolen money while attending several temples, and the frequency of the crime and most of the victims have not been recovered, and the Defendant has the record of criminal punishment several times as a same crime (three times). In particular, the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime, there are no extenuating circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the sentence of the lower judgment, and other factors such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, and all other factors of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, it is not determined that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.