However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 8, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of two million won or more for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on the ground of the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and around August 12, 2013, the defendant was issued a summary order of five million won or more for the same crime in the same court.

On September 1, 2014, at around 23:25, the Defendant, without a car driver’s license, driven Bone Star vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a distance of about 100 meters up to the roads front of the “cocoat store” located in the same city of the same city on the roads in front of a cafeteria located in the same city of the city of the same city, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.05%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. No. 2-4 of the evidence list as requested by the prosecutor

1. Records before judgment: Application of the above evidence list No. 7;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., mitigation of discretionary mitigation);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no higher reception of alcoholic beverages and there is an attempt not to repeat the same kind of crime in

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;