In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

The Defendants are married, and the victims D(n, 39 years old) are shot by the Defendants, and the Defendants were doubtful that the victims D are blick with victims E (ma, 31 years old).

On July 28, 2012, at around 23:40, the Defendants: (a) 23:40 on July 28, 2012, the victims were on board a motor vehicle, and (b) the Defendant Company A took the part of the victim’s head at once, and (c) had expressed the attitude that the victim’s head was reflected in several times, and threatened the victim’s D; (b) the victim’s face was taken several times, and (c) the victim’s face was taken one time by drinking, and the Defendant B took part of the victim’s face.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim D, such as chrokes and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim E, such as chrokes and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant D’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. A written diagnosis of injury (E, D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on Ctv video data;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more.