However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 30, 2015, at around 05:15, the Defendant, while drunk in the “Csing room” corridor located in the Daegu Seo-gu B, Daegu-gu, had been driven voluntarily by a police officer F of the relevant police box, who was called out after having received D’s report, and had been driven voluntarily with the Esing box.

At around 05:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) went to a patrol boat before and after the police box located in Daegu Seo-gu G, and subsequently went to the patrol boat, and (b) committed assault by the F to the said F that demanded him to go to the police box, saying, “in Korea, he is a member of the National Assembly, he is only dead.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no record of punishment, other than twice a fine for dual punishment, and that there is a serious reflect on his/her mistake);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;