However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around March 24, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) operated a vehicle B in column B while under the influence of alcohol for about 0.115% of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 3km from the front of a restaurant where the trade name in the Yong-gu, Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun cannot be known to the front day of the day of the ambal engineering.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), violation of the Road Traffic Act (SP) and the Road Traffic Act (SP) around the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, driving a car in the above Cland and driving a two-lane road in front of DHMC Industries C at a speed that is impossible to identify one-lane from the side of the DHM Heavy Industries to the direction of static engineing.

Since there is a road where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is obliged to thoroughly drive the motor vehicle in front and safely in compliance with the lane.

Nevertheless, under the negligence of the Defendant’s neglecting this, the Defendant took the front door and front door of the FST5 vehicle of the victim E driver’s FSS5 vehicle from the two-lanes of the opposite part due to the negligence of driving the center line, and took the front door as the front part of the driver’s left side of the vehicle, and the front door was driving over to the extent of 500 meters as it is, while witnessing the accident site and driving the vehicle at the same time, and the above co-section was opened to the left side of the vehicle of the victim G driver’s G driver’s car in order to stop the front side by driving the vehicle, and received the front part of the vehicle as the front part of the right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, destroyed and damaged the MF5 car owned by the victim E to have an amount equivalent to KRW 4,855,571, and stopped immediately, thereby providing relief to the victim.