[criminal records] On June 8, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on October 2, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 2, 201. On December 9, 2010, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of one year to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. on the 17th of the same month. On December 15, 2011, the judgment became final and conclusive on December 23, 201 after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the same court on December 15, 201.

In addition, on January 20, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Chuncheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 28th of the same month.

[Criminal facts] 2015 Highest 2726

1. The criminal defendant against the victim G is aware of the victim's purchase of the forest land of H H and 11 in Ansan-gu, Y-gu, Ansan-si, and thus, the victim has a close relationship with the bank-related persons, and thus, the victim is able to obtain a sufficient loan after receiving an appraisal of its business

In other words, from May 2010 to January 201, 201, the victims borrowed approximately KRW 130 million in terms of expenses to interview the bank parties from the victims.

After the end of January 201, 201, the Defendant would provide the victim with the project funds by receiving an appraisal of the land of the common city of Ansan-si and the land of the common city of Gwangju-si and the land of the common city of JJ and 29.

The term "" refers to the following.

As above, while the Defendant had to lend approximately KRW 130 million from the damaged party to another party, the Defendant called the victim at the Seoul Franch site on February 1, 201, and “I land and J land were well appraised.”

I see by facsimile. I need to find the original copy, but I need to pay the appraisal fee of KRW 20 million.

Transfer of KRW 20 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of K to the Agricultural Cooperative Account.

“A false representation was made.”

The fact is that the appraisal report under the name of the Korean appraiser who sent the defendant by facsimile is a false appraisal report, and the defendant does not have any hostile request for appraisal.