However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 28, 2013, at around 02:20 on June 28, 2013, the Defendant, who interfered with business, has a conflict between the Defendant and the Defendant, while drinking alcohol in the “Dcafeteria” restaurant operated by the Victim C in Suwon-si B.

Along to about 25 minutes of disturbance, such as gathering food, chairs, etc. in a place where it was difficult to do so, it obstructed the victim's restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbances between about 25 minutes.

2. On June 28, 2013, the Defendant expressed, as in paragraph 1, that the Defendant 112 reported that he would be free from disturbance, to the police officers called “this sprinke, sprinke, sprinke,” who called “I am free from disturbance,” and told F of “I am free from the face of am free from the face of am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from the face of am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from am free from am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting management work.

3. Around 02:50 on June 28, 2013, the Defendant insultd the victim G, who was a policeman, among several persons, including the Defendant, in the E District, C, and other civil petitioners located in Suwon-si, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim, including the victim G, who was a policeman.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of C, F, and G;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the body photographs of police officers who suffered an injury at the time of arrest, criminal investigation report (on-site exit status, etc.), criminal investigation report, accusation report, receipts, damaged body photographs of the suspect at the time of arrest, appearance of the suspect at the time of arrest, on-site photographs of the victim,

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with business and choice of imprisonment), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties and choice of imprisonment), the Criminal Act.