According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and only asserted mental disorder and sentencing for reasons of appeal.

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just for the court below to reject the defendant's claim on the mental and physical disorder on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law not

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in the case where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, a final appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the sentence is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.