도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. The conclusion that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, thereby opposing his mistake.
However, since 206, the defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment once from around 200 for the violation of the Road Traffic Act or the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving), on May 18, 2010, the sentence of imprisonment for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) at the Jeju District Court on May 18, 201 is two years after the suspension of execution in June, 200; the same court on June 15, 2010; two years after the suspension of execution in April; the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving); and on August 29, 2013, the same court at the same court on August 29, 201, after being sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months, 1 year after the expiration of the last suspension of execution period; and on the other hand, the defendant's age, character, and behavior before and after the crime of this case; and the circumstances of this case are considered as inappropriate.
3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.