2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the court below's judgment that found the defendant guilty by rejecting the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion is just and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

A. The witness H testified in the court of the court below that "The running distance of a sugar is beyond her husband, her will, her will, and the defendant was laid down in the office of this case as sound and hummatics, and the victim who is her husband, was laid down in the body of this case. The witness H testified in the court of the court below that " under the front book of the victim, the rest was left behind the victim in a condition where she was damaged by verbal bend."

In addition, when the injured person out of the office makes a request for help by telephone to the above witness and moves to the place where the injured person is the victim, the injured person was living in the Gu and the honor of the noble person is the same as the next in the state of the noble person.

The next Guidea shall continue to be a hump.

1. The Defendant testified that the Plaintiff “ was able to talk.”

B. The testimony of H of the lower court as referred to in the foregoing A is specific and clear as to ① the situation before and after the occurrence of the instant case, the behavior of the Defendant and the victim, and the description of the main contents, such as the verbally damaged Defendant, etc. (the aforementioned witness is placed far away).