2. The plaintiff and the defendant among the costs of lawsuit.

A. B, around 05:40 on January 23, 2015, driving a car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driving a three-lane road on the front side of “Thyeong-gu, Taenam-si, Sunam-si, Taenam-si, Taenam-si, Taehyeong-si, Taehyeong-si, Taehyeong-do, Taehyeong-do, Gohyeong-do.”

나. 그 때 원고는 D SM5 승용차(이하, ‘원고 차량’이라고 한다)를 운전하여 위 도로를 피고 차량 전방에서 1차로를 따라 진행하면서 전방좌우를 잘 살피고 조향 및 제동장치를 정확하게 조작하여야 할 주의의무의 이행을 게을리한 과실로, 위 지하차도의 입구 중앙 부분을 원고 차량의 좌측 앞 측면 부분으로 충격하여 2차로로 튕겨져 나가면서 반시계방향으로 돌다가 원고 차량을 피하기 위하여 1차로에서 2차로로 차로를 변경하였다가 다시 1차로로 차로를 변경하던 피고 차량의 우측 앞부분이 원고 차량의 우측 앞부분과 충돌하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) C.

Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the dynasium, etc.

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

E. The Plaintiff’s successor paid KRW 9,966,720 to the Plaintiff who became a beneficiary of the disability pension due to the instant accident, as a disability pension up to September 2016.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap's evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 5 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap's evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Recognition of liability for damages;

A. The parties' assertion that the accident of this case occurred because the defendant driver B failed to properly perform the duty of safe driving, such as violating the duty of safe driving and the duty of safe driving on the front side and the duty of safe driving, etc., and the plaintiff's negligence competes with the plaintiff, the defendant, the insurer, and the plaintiff.