2. In light of the fact that an automobile not covered by the judgment mandatory insurance operates an automobile, and the quality of the crime of this case was inferior, that the Defendant was punished for traffic offense, that there was two times the fact that the Defendant was punished for traffic offense, that the Defendant’s attitude of being tried by having been absent on two occasions at the court below and the trial court, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., as shown in the records and arguments of this case, are considered to be inappropriate since the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.