beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고정479

경범죄처벌법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was arrested in the act of committing an act in the act of committing an offense, was transferred to the criminal office of the Taedong Police Station and the office of the Taedong Police Station and brought in, on November 20, 2014, failed to answer a disturbance in the state of being taken by the government office, such as “I would know why he has been arrested, should he receive such treatment,” “I would know why he has been arrested, should he be treated as such,” and “I would get off, get out, and have franced, smoking, and try to add his performance to the police officer.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C, D, and E [the credibility of each statement is recognized since not only the contents of witness's statements at the time are consistent and specific, but also there is no contradiction among the statements, and there are no other circumstances to open false statements, and there are no other circumstances to open false statements];

1. A written statement of C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (in case of suspect behavior after handing over the police station);

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order denies the Defendant’s crime. However, the police officer who investigated the Defendant at the time sought a letter of apology with the police officer, and the police officer submitted a written application seeking the Defendant’s wife, and the police officer partially reduced the amount of fine determined by the summary order, taking into account the fact that there was a visual disability of Grade 6, and there was a visual disability, and thereby determining the punishment as set forth in the summary order.