전자금융거래법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of two million won) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the instant crime, was the first offender with no record of criminal punishment, and the economic situation is not good.
B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the crime of this case harms the security and reliability of financial transactions using the means of access to the means of electronic financial transactions; (b) the means of access to the electronic financial transactions transferred by the crime of this case can be the means of various other criminal acts, such as so-called “scam,” etc.; and (c) the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even
C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.