B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000.

From October of the same year, the Defendants came to know that they were working for the same company as a member of the company engaging in real estate brokerage business on or around March 2012, which led to the conflict that Defendant B interfered with the brokerage business of Defendant A from March 2014.

Defendant

B was threatened by intimidation as stated in the facts charged in the dismissal of prosecution section as follows, and it was doubtful that labor unions and A would be able to spread to their children about sexual relations.

Defendant

B around March 17, 2014, at the real estate office of N in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, written a false complaint stating the following: “A forcibly rapes a complainant who was drunkly drunk at the O Pel on May 2013, and threatens the complainant to disclose sexual relation, thereby inducing the complainant to disclose his/her sexual relation, and thereby, subject to punishment of KRW 3 million on November 21, 2013, and five million on February 15, 2014.”

Defendant

B On March 19, 2014, the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Nowon-ro received the above complaint by mail to the Dongjak-gu Police Station located in 148.

However, there was no fact that there was a threat to the defendant that he forced the defendant under the influence of the above defendant A to commit rape or to force sexual intercourse.

Nevertheless, Defendant B received a false complaint from the Dongjak Police Station as mentioned above with the aim of having A subject to criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Written complaint and statement (referred to Nos. 1 and 2 of the evidence list);

1. Application of each prosecutor's protocol of interrogation to the Defendants (including questioning statements)

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 3 (Confession) of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse.