When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 25, 2017, the Defendant was unable to enter the 4th floor C Cakiter of the building B at P.M., and on the ground that the Defendant was unable to have avoided any disturbance, such as having a large interest in the above Bana, prior to that time, from D, who is an employee of the above Bana.

Before December 27, 2017, “I want to refund the right to use a horse, I want to hear the horse and stop to take the horse.” On the other hand, I am a hole on the shoulder, if I am going to the F box on December 25, 2017, while I am going to the F box and was refused to do so to the women-only - D et al., and I am to go to the F box, and I am to write off the shoulder by flabing and pushing the shoulder by a half the half.

“A false accusation of the false content” was submitted, and the investigation was conducted on January 5, 2018 by Symna Symna and Symnamnam Symna on December 25, 2017, which was assaulted by Symnas or D before Symnamnas.

D here, we have been in favor of selling at the end of the flst and flive.

The arm's length of the arm's length was divided into flaf and was pushed down with the will of the arm's length.

Since then, since now, since it occurred in the chair, it was pushed down with more hand.

D Assaultd to the arms in question.

D is intended for punishment of D.

“A false statement.”

Accordingly, the defendant made up and submitted a false statement of complaint with the intention of having D criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of witness D, G and H;

1. The existing statement protocol against the accused and the police statement protocol against the accused (a defense counsel only for the defendant's purpose to obtain amnesty against the defendant's unfair treatment, but it was alleged that the defendant did not file a complaint with the intent to obtain DNA punishment. However, in light of the contents of the complaint submitted by the defendant and the fact that the defendant stated that he/she want to punish obviously D in the course of investigation, there was a purpose to require D to be subject to criminal punishment.

As such, the above argument is not accepted.