When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a doctor operating the “E Council member” under the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D shop 406.

On April 1, 2010, the Defendant claimed medical care benefit expenses from the Victim Health Insurance Corporation as if he/she provided medical care to patients F, even though he/she provided non-medical care to the patient F, and the Defendant was paid KRW 12,965,080 in total over 12,436 times in the same manner as in the list of crimes in the attached Table from March 30, 2013, as well as receiving KRW 11,500 from the Health Insurance Corporation as medical care benefit expenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. A certificate;

1. A list of persons eligible for double claims for medical care benefit costs after medical treatment eligible for non-benefit;

1. Fact-finding certificates;

1. A statement of medical care benefit costs of exemplary recipients and copies of medical treatment records;

1. Application of other related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;