A. The Plaintiff is the owner of CKaone Star Car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and Defendant B is the owner of D Private Taxi Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”), and Defendant B is the Korean Federation of Passenger Taxi Transport Business Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is the insurer of Defendant vehicle.

B. Around 06:25 on May 21, 2012, Defendant B driven the Defendant’s vehicle and driven the front road in front of the front road of the Defendant’s vehicle while driving the front road in front of the front road, and caused an accident to shock the front side of the other vehicle parked on the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was parked in front of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused an accident to shock the front side of the other vehicle parked in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Due to the instant accident, the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was considerably damaged to the extent that the repair cost was excessive, and the Defendant Union leased a car to F as the Plaintiff’s internal director from May 21, 2012 to May 31, 2012, who was the actual operator of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, as the Plaintiff’s internal director.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-3, Eul evidence 2, 5, 9, 13 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) each entry and video, and the purport of the entire pleadings]

2. Determination:

A. According to the above facts finding that the accident of this case was caused by the mistake of Defendant B, and thus, the Defendant Union, the insurer of Defendant B and Defendant Vehicle, is jointly and severally liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the above tort.

B. The Defendants’ assertion of comparative negligence against the Defendants was in a state of illegal parking at the time of the instant accident. Since the Plaintiff’s mistake is one of the causes of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s fault of 10% should be considered, and the Defendants’ liability should be limited.