A. Defendant B all the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 4:

B. Defendant C shall be listed in the attached Table 6.

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Determination as to Defendant D

A. According to the evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the facts constituting the cause for the claim can be acknowledged. Article 49 (6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents provides that "when the approval and public notice of the management and disposal plan is given, the owners, superficies, leaseers, etc. of the previous land or buildings shall not use or benefit from the previous land or buildings until the date of public notice of relocation under Article 54." Thus, due to the authorization and public notice of the management and disposal plan, the defendant would lose the right to use or benefit from the real estate, and the project implementer of the rearrangement project of this case, who is the project implementer of the

B. As to this, the defendant asserted that the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff to confirm the status of a member of the Seoul Administrative Court as 2017Guhap54111, and that it is impossible to accept the plaintiff's claim since it was not paid compensation for losses. However, according to the facts of administrative litigation as above, the plaintiff's claim cannot be denied, and according to the evidence No. 10, the plaintiff's claim can be acknowledged as being deposited with the local Land Tribunal on October 2017. Thus, the defendant's claim is rejected.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is accepted.