"A defect in common areas of 33-1 landscaping" in the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "a defect in common areas of 57,379,094" as the repair cost of "50,716,451" in the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "a defect in common areas of 33-1 landscaping," "50,716,451" as "50," "a 13,041,580," "14,049,460," "A" in the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "a defect in common areas of 33-1 landscaping", "a defect in common areas of 33-1 landscaping," and "a defect in the attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, 101,07,97,49,497 "B" as "a", "a total appraisal fee of 731,46,75,81,7

After the inspection on the use of divided construction costs (units): 71,781,735,312,312,11,299,2840,747,477,852,47,47,477,47,47,47, 62,835,835,312,99,2840,190,143543,5672,5672,642,642,642,645,71680,314,3142,479,479,4749,4757,479,479,479,4757,479,4749,4757,947,947,4757,947,947,97,47,975,47,97,97,47,47,222,49,47,49

The results of an appraisal and supplementation to an appraiser in the first instance judgment shall be added to the fourth [based grounds for recognition] of the first instance judgment.

The 6th to 7th parallels in the judgment of the first instance are deleted from the 6th parallels to the 3rd parallels in the 7th parallels, the 13th parallels and the 4. Conclusion, respectively.

The following shall be added after the 11th day of the first instance judgment:

Although the defendant asserts that the defect in common part 28 corresponds to the defect prior to the pre-use inspection, according to the appraiser A's appraisal result and the result of each appraisal supplementation for the first instance court and the above appraiser's above appraiser's appraisal result, it is reasonable to view the above construction as the defect that occurred after the pre-use inspection in light of the fact that the above construction part was normally constructed in some sections of the apartment of this case.