손해배상(자)
1. The plaintiff A's lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The Defendant: (a) 500,000 won to Plaintiff B and its related thereto from June 15, 2015 to April 2017.
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1, 2, and 3, and evidence 5-1:
1) Plaintiff B is the father of Plaintiff A. 2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D 1 ton of freight vehicles (hereinafter “instant freight vehicles”).
B. The occurrence of the instant accident occurred: (a) around 16:03, Jun. 15, 2015, the Plaintiff was driving the instant cargo from the F University of Ansan-si to the roadside-si (hereinafter “F University”) on the roadside-do road along the four-lane roads of H located in Ansan-si, Andong-si.
At the same four-lanes, Plaintiff A was driving an IOba (hereinafter “the instant Obaba”), but E changed its course to four-lanes, and received the left part of the instant Obaba in front of the right part of the instant cargo vehicle.
Due to its shock, the Plaintiff A suffered injuries to the pipe and tensions of detailed unknown brains in which there is no open address in two parts, the pipe and tension of the part of the secret part of the secret part of which is in detail, and the tensions and tensions of the secret part of the secret part of which are in detail, and the tensions and tensions of the base
(hereinafter “instant accident”) 2. Determination
A. 1) The Defendant’s lawsuit on the defense prior to the merits was brought in violation of the subordinate agreement entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the damages alleged by the Plaintiffs cannot be deemed as losses subsequent to the conclusion of the instant agreement. Therefore, the instant lawsuit is unlawful as there is no benefit in the protection of rights, on the grounds that there is no interest in the protection of rights, and each of the following facts are acknowledged. 2) The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the items in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2.
(1) On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant received the following amount from the Defendant as damages for the instant accident.