A. On February 4, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works with the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology to subcontract reinforced concrete construction works to the construction cost of KRW 1,470,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant contract”) (hereinafter “instant contract”) among the D High School Construction Works ordered by Seocho Village Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “landscape Construction”), and on February 24, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works with the content of subcontracting reinforced concrete construction works to the construction cost of KRW 1,373,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) among D High School Construction Works ordered by Seowon Village Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Sari Village

("each construction of this case" in total) B.

On March 6, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with landscape construction to lease temporary materials, such as short pipes and white tubes, and supplied temporary materials to each of the instant construction sites from March 15, 2012 to December 1, 2012.

C. As landscape construction did not pay rent of KRW 70,344,112 to the Plaintiff and did not return some temporary materials, around November 14, 2012, the Plaintiff transferred the claim for construction cost of KRW 171,000,000 relating to the instant contract to the Plaintiff with the indemnity for the said rent and the unpaid temporary materials (hereinafter “transfer of claims”), and on the same day notified the Defendant of the instant transfer of claims by mail with the content-certified fixed date, and the said notification reached the Defendant on November 15, 2012.

The construction cost that the Defendant had not paid until October 2012 due to the instant contract for landscape construction is at least KRW 192,60,000.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 7, Eul evidence 1, 14, and 15 (including each number), witness E's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the above acquisition amount to the plaintiff who acquired the claim of KRW 171,00,000 out of the construction price under the contract of this case.

2.3.