However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

Defendant

A and B are married couple, and they have conspiredd to steals goods at D and discount stores, their ancillary children.

On November 4, 2012, the Defendants removed and stored one security strawet equivalent to KRW 19,90,00 in the middle-gu Seoul Central District, Jung-gu, 81, Defendant A, and Defendant B and D with 1,30,30,30,30,30,14,90,30,000 non-bbrogs in the amount of KRW 1,30,90,30,000, 16,90,90, and 30,000,000, more than KRW 1,84,90,000,000, and 97,00,000, more than KRW 1,99,000,000, more than KRW 1,84,90,90,000, more than KRW 97,000,000, more than KRW 94,90,90,00.

As a result, Defendants and D jointly stolen goods worth KRW 712,010 in total in market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and D

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to theft items and theft photographs;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (the amount of damage is not so large and all damaged goods are recovered);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Discretionary mitigation and the fact that there is no major criminal history);