If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2017. 9. 17. 22:30 경부터 같은 날 22:58 경까지 수원시 팔달구 B 피해자 C(58 세, 여) 이 운영하는 'D' 제 과점 내에서 피해자 E(36 세, 여) 외 1명의 종업원에게 방금 기프트콘으로 교환한 케이크가 사진과 다르다는 이유로 “ 야, 이 썅 년 아 왜 사기를 치냐,

It interfered with the task task of the victims by force for about 30 minutes by creating a disturbance, such as sending off the phone by a sudden cutting, hinginginging, leaving, etc. with a large voice.

2. The Defendant, who received a report at the same time and at the same place as 1.1. paragraph, posted the Defendant to the scene, and publicly insultd the victim who is a police official, such as “F(34)”, among the employees E, etc., who are the public official of the police, “I am out, am out, am out, am out, am out, and am out,” and “I am out and am out,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses C, E, and F other than each trial;

1. Application of CCTV or mobile phone photographing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business, the selection of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult and the selection of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;