소유권이전등기
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① The plaintiff was corrected to be "the defendant"; ② the defendant was in charge of the plaintiff's management since the completion of the construction work, ② the "the fact that the plaintiff was in charge of the E reservoir until then after the completion of the construction work" was changed to "the fact that the E reservoir was in charge of the construction work since the 625 War since the completion of the construction work," and ③ the "the fact that the plaintiff was in charge of the above reservoir" was in charge of the above reservoir management until now," and ③ the "the fact that the E reservoir was in charge of the construction work" was in charge of the above reservoir 2 at the time of the first 4th 4th e.g., the "the fact that the K reservoir was not in charge" and the "the fact that the plaintiff was in charge of the above reservoir 2 at the time of the second e.g., the fact that the plaintiff was in possession of the land before the completion of the national tax adjudication office around 1987.