However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On November 26, 2014, at around 22:30 on November 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sent a victim D (25 years of age) with a view to enjoy the present door password from the pure side of the Defendant’s house located in Scheon City to enter the house; and (b) made a dispute with the victim, the victim took a deadly weapon, which he gets off by telephone, and entered the house at the kitchen of the kitchen in the kitchen, while the victim was in a dispute, and took a deadly weapon ( approximately 24 cm in length, approximately 13 cm in length in length, and knife in the kitchen; (c) and (d) the victim “I will throw away the victim from the front of the clerical error.” (d) The escape shows that the victim seems to have done any act that would inflict harm on the victim by driving about 50 meters away from the 50 meters of age.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police about D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) is a first offender who has no record of criminal punishment; Article 62 (1) that deposits a certain amount for the victim, the victim and the victim disputing the victim by telephone, seems to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent and contingent manner; Article 62 (1)