When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 29, 2016, at the dry field located in Kim Jong-si, around 17:00 on May 29, 2016, the Defendant demanded that the victim D, who is the vegetable, set a brue, with a brusto in dry field, containing a brusto, and demanded that the victim set a brusto in dry field. However, the Defendant destroyed a brus to the dry field, containing a 30,000 won of the market price owned by the victim, wherein the brusto, contained a brusto in dry field.

It was damaged by breaking pipes installed at a dry field near the paddy field.

2. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30 on June 22, 2016, in the dry field located in Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si; (b) the Defendant’s mother would throw away the Defendant’s shoulder that F is cultivated in the dry field from the dry field to the Defendant’s mother.

말하는 것을 듣고 화가 나, 밭에 있던 쇠파이프로 피해자 소유의 경운기의 엔진 부분을 내리쳐 움푹 들어가게 하여 수리비 150,000원 상당이 들도록 손괴하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Evidence List 4);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) at the time and place stated in the facts charged in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) at the victim’s location, three booms containing 90,000 won or more of the market price owned by the Defendant were discarded to dry field; and (c) at the dry field near dry field, the Defendant destroyed and damaged piping pipes installed at the dry field.

B. (1) Determinations (1) The Defendant consistently stated that three destructions of the Bluluto Bluto Bluos are limited to only one Blulutop bluto, and that four parts are not abandoned.

Even if the statement was made by the police of the victim and by this court, the victim was normally placed in the dry field even if he was on the same day.

Blulu Blus Beta.