If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. On May 23, 2016, at around 02:03, the Defendant: (a) discovered a cyberphone 6 mobile phone with the market price of KRW 1,00,000,000, which was 20,000,000, which was 10:00,000 from the “Sariri-distance” to the U.S. child’s “Sari-distance” located at the seat;

2. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) discovered a mobile phone with the type of a mobile phone having lost the victim’s name in the DNA Bata taxi operated by himself/herself at an irregular and irregular place; (b) and (c) embezzled the mobile phone with the intent to dispose of it at the time when he/she was in the business custody of the victim for six times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. A copy of a protocol of suspect examination of the police against F;

1. Records of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Details of currency;

1. G text messages;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (victim C telephone communications);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;