2. The crime of this case in light of the fact that the defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a loan from the lending company after deceiving the victim, and that the amount of the loan is not only the amount obtained by defraudation but also the victim suffered serious economic damage due to the crime of this case, the crime of this case is not very good.

In addition, considering the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, the fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victim until the judgment of the court below was rendered, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered newly after the sentence of the court below, the balance between the criminal punishment for other crimes similar to the instant crime and the criminal punishment for the Defendant’s age, family environment, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.