The reasons to be stated in this part are as stated in Paragraph (1) of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

(The main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act) The defendant's negligence accounts for the whole proportion in the occurrence of the instant accident by the parties.

Although Defendant Deceased was skilled craftsmen engaged in a towing operations for not less than 10 years, he did not observe the safety rules delivered by the Defendant, and did not observe them. At the time of the instant accident, it is highly probable that the Deceased would have voluntarily set the knee kne kne kne kne kne kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne

Meanwhile, during the month from the date of the instant accident to July 18, 2016, the Deceased’s University Hospital received external medical treatment and treatment from the date of the instant accident, and from July 18, 2016 to the date of the instant accident.

9. From March 31, 2017, after receiving rehabilitation medical treatment at the H hospital until March 23, 2017, the disease was caused by the “unexploitic shock infection” and there was a time difference of about 10 months between the accident in this case and the death of the deceased and the death of the deceased who is not a private person, there is no proximate causal relation between the death of the accident in this case and the death of the deceased.

The occurrence of liability

A. The Defendant may sustain an injury in the knife knife of the beginning of the towing, in a case where the center would be lost while engaging in the operation of the towing machine in the slope of a sloping of responsibility (it cannot be deemed that the occurrence of the same accident is unforeseeable). As such, the Defendant shall have the workmen wear adequate protective outfits, supervise the situation where the workers wear protective outfits, and provide necessary safety education.