However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 14, 2015, the Defendant, at D main points located in Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, around 02:30 on October 14, 2015, brought the victim’s left side part of drinking water, which the victim was able to drink with the victim E (46 tax) and F, on the ground that the victim was her speech without a brucation, and turned down twice as drinking water the part of the victim’s left side part of drinking water that the victim was able to flow on the floor of the breath.

The defendant and the victim suffered injury to the victim by drinking and drinking out the victim on the left side of the treatment number of days of treatment when the victim was able to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in written appraisal of autopsy;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommended punishment] General Injury (the scope of recommended punishment / General Bodily Injury) / [6 months-2 years] of serious injury (the person subject to special aggravation] / The degree of injury / the degree of injury, reflectivity, and survivor agreement, etc. shall be considered.