beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.05.08 2013고단682

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the indictment against insult is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution of official duties by the Seoul Western District Court for the same reason, and on August 12, 2009, the said court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 18, 2009, and completed the execution of each of the said punishment in the North Western Northern Northern Family Court on August 3, 2010.

1. On March 24, 2013, around 04:40 on March 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was the head of E, a site where he was under the influence of alcohol, on the ground that there was a dispute with D, his spouse, while drinking in the front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

In the vicinity, the victim F, who was a taxi engineer, stopped the taxi at the time, and did not report 112 to the police, and the defendant, who was making the 112 report, went to the police, and without his permission, opened the front door of the above taxi.

Since then, the Defendant: (a) removed a victim company G, a victim company established in the above taxi with the Defendant’s hand; (b) removed a victim F, which was attached to the above taxi, from the Defendant’s hand; (c) removed a victim F, a victim F, which was attached to the above taxi, with the Defendant’s hand; (d) removed a victim’s certificate of qualification for taxi operation; and (e) reduced the victim F, who was suffering from the above f, and damaged the victim’s property.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the Defendant at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, as well as at the time and place, to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender for the crime specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, such as: (a) defects in arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender for the crime specified in paragraph (1); and (b) the Defendant’s hand less than I’s neck with respect to the victim’s face twice; and (c) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of I, E, and F;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: