beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2014.11.12 2013가합200090

공사대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates construction business, interior decoration business, etc., and the Defendant is a company that operates landscaping business, interior decoration business, design construction business, etc.

B. The Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Defendant for each of the following construction works (hereinafter “each of the instant construction works”) that the Defendant contracted from the Defendant to Hyundai Industrial Development, etc., and completed.

The construction period of public works, B, from March 1, 2010 to September 2, 2010, from March 1, 2010 to September 2, 201, the construction works of the Rotterdam C, including food sections 1 to March 22, 2011 to August 9, 201, and the construction works of 1 to 4 stories, including 1 to 20.4 stories, from May 2, 201 to 20.10, from May 201 to August 26, 201, and from May 201 to 10, 201, from May 3, 201 to August 26, 2011, from May 2, 201 to August 1, 2015 to 3, 201, from August 1, 201.

C. When the Plaintiff calculated the construction cost by multiplying the volume of the construction work by the unit price after completing the subcontracted construction work from the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Defendant traded it in the form of paying the construction cost after undergoing the final consultation with the Plaintiff. At the time of each of the instant construction work, the Plaintiff did not separately prepare a subcontract construction contract.

On February 24, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to settle the third research Dong construction cost of G Hospital as KRW 787,907,454, and the first construction cost of the dormitory Dong as of February 24, 2012 (each separate value-added tax), and the said content is the same.