When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Except as otherwise provided for in Acts and subordinate statutes, no one shall lend any means of access to electronic financial transactions for consideration to any third person.

Nevertheless, around July 2014, the Defendant listened to the statement that “I will use and return the passbook for three months if I want to use and return it,” from a person who is not in charge of his name, and issued the post office passbook (C), physical check card, password, one bank passbook (D), physical check card, and password to the person who is not in charge of his name, using Oba Kwikset service.

As such, the Defendant lent a means of access to electronic financial transactions to another person for consideration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A certificate of transfer, a detailed statement of financial transactions, and an inquiry table of the details of transactions of deposits;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a petition;

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.