However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On January 16, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Flag Flag Flag, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support for the development of Flag method and source on September 18, 2009.

[2] On June 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) while driving CK5 cars with alcohol content of 0.119% at the Han River University Sung-gu Central Park at the direction of the world at the Han River University, the Defendant: (b) while under the influence of alcohol on the road in front of the Han River University at the Han River University at the direction of the world on June 29, 2015, the Defendant: (c) was under the influence of driving CK5 cars with alcohol content of 0.19% at the Han River University; (d) was under the influence of alcohol, and (e) was under the influence of the victim D, who was parked on the front left and right of the Jeon River at the front of the said K5 car; and (e) was under the influence of the said passenger car, the Defendant was under the back of the said passenger car owned by the victim F.

The Defendant, by the foregoing negligence, destroyed the said golf car to be repaired by KRW 9,293,546, and escaped without immediately stopping the said golf car and without taking necessary measures, even though it damages the repair cost of KRW 700,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each statement of F and H;

1. The circumstantial report of a driver driving a drinking, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous conviction: The defendant asserts to the effect that he did not constitute a non-measures after an accident and did not intend to do so, since he/she found a parking place because he/she did not park, and that he/she did not act as a non-measures after an accident.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., at the time, the repair cost of one of the damaged vehicles occurs in the range of KRW 10 million and the left side of the damaged vehicle.