except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 22:24, at the “C” restaurant located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu B, held that the victim D (the age of 28) (the age of her employee) was a dangerous object on the ground that he/she would act without a breathrothing, making it difficult for the victim to be exposed to a beer who is a dangerous object, so that the victim’s face can be unbrupted, and that the victim’s face needs to be treated more

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: A sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking full account of all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances of the crime after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, including the following: (a) the injury was inflicted on the beer who is a dangerous object; (b) the history of the crime related to violence; and (c) the statutory penalty for the crime of special injury is stipulated only by imprisonment, and thus it is impossible to choose other types of punishment: (a) confession and reflects; (b)