성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months and a fine of up to three million won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operates the “C” on the 3rd floor in Bupyeong-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
From March 25, 2015 to June 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) installed six smugglings at the said establishment from around 60 square meters to around 60, and employed six female employees, including D, E, F, and G; (b) directed female employees in a sealed room after receiving 35,00 won from the unfolding customers who find the place; and (c) led female employees waiting in the place of business to engage in the act of similarity by causing them to scam or fall off the sexual organ of customers; and (d) provided them with money equivalent to 20,000 won out of the amount of sexual traffic received from customers to female employees to arrange sexual traffic.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H by the prosecution;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect to I and J;
1. Photographs, business concern photographs and advertising photographs;
1. Each place of criminal;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation and investigation;
1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., choice of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):
1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is running again after the enforcement of the reason for sentencing of the provisional payment order.
Considering the fact that the crime was controlled, the period of business, etc., the fact that the defendant led to his confession and reflects against the crime, the fact that the defendant discontinued with his intent not to commit the same kind of crime as this case, and other circumstances after the crime are considered, it is so decided as per Disposition.