However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 4, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, at the Chungcheong District Court’s Chungcheong Branch Branch, and on October 5, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court.

The defendant is a person who drives B Poter Cargo Vehicles.

On August 16, 2013, at around 20:15, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at a section of about 15 meters from the front of the Danyang-gun Audio-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and the front of the same Riyang-do, while under the influence of alcohol with a 0.126% alcohol concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of the status of the driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (report accompanied by a copy of summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty; Selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The defendant again commits the instant crime even though he/she had a two-time driving record, and the circumstances favorable to the purport of amending the Road Traffic Act to strengthen the punishment for drunk driving: The defendant reflects his/her crime and other circumstances attached to the sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and family environment, shall be taken into consideration.