A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

1. On December 16, 2015, Defendant A: (a) around 00:00, at the “E main point” located in Young-gun, Young-gun, Nam Young-gun; (b) performed drinking together with other behaviors, such as the victim B (48 years old); and (c) the victim, who fladdd with the horses, “the victim who flads to other people with respect to his private life,” was hacking the victim’s breath, and fladding the breath, and fladding the victim’s breath, and flading the victim’s blad with the floor, the victim suffered injury, such as an unfladation of drilling that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) where the victim A (54) was involved in assault, such as flabing bomb, etc., he saw an empty beer, which is a dangerous object on the table, and flabing a part of the victim’s flab, brought about approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment) and Article 257(1) B of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants on probation: The Defendant alleged that the Defendant’s assertion of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act regarding Defendant B’s act of the Defendant committed an injury to the victim for the purpose of protecting his body and life from the attack of the Defendant A, and that it constitutes a legitimate defense. However, in full view of the above evidence, the Defendant’s act cannot be deemed as an act aimed at defending the current infringement of his/her own or others’ legal interests, and thus, it cannot be deemed as a legitimate defense with considerable grounds. Thus, the

Reasons for sentencing

1. The defendant A [typed Decision] type 1 (general injury) (the general person in charge of sentencing) shall be the general injury of the defendant A (the person in charge of special sentencing).