도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 7, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on the violation of the Road Traffic Act. On September 20, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court. On September 15, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the same court.
On September 18, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.120% among the blood transfusion around 01:10, 00%, driven a BM520 vehicle at a section of about 500 meters from the roads located in the front door of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, without a driver’s license.
2. When the Defendant, at the time and place stated in paragraph 1, was under control by driving alcohol at a place, the Defendant forged the Defendant’s signature with a view to identifying the control on the portable information terminal (PDA) on which the Busan East Police Station’s slope C belonging to the traffic safety department, and indicating the name of the Defendant’s figure “D” in the signature column at the place.
3. The Defendant forged a private document at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, stating the name of “D”, which is the type of the Defendant’s seal, in the driver’s confirmation column presented by E in the circumstances surrounding the transportation safety department at the Busan East Police Station, and forged a copy of the driver’s circumstantial statement report in the name of D, which is a private document concerning the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s signature on the next page, for the purpose of uttering.
4. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, submitted to the above C the forged signature of “D” and the state driver’s circumstantial report as if they were duly formed.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Inquiries into the results of crackdown on driving under drinking and the statement of the circumstances of the driver under driving under the influence of alcohol; and