A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

[2013 Highest 2000]

1. On August 7, 2013, around 02:56, Defendant A’s night building intrusion theft: (a) came to a G cafeteria operated by the victim F of the victim F in Gwangju Mine-gu; (b) opened an unclaimed window by the restaurant entrance in his/her hand; and (c) intruded into the above cafeteria, and then stolen the victim’s property with one gallon-2 smartphone equivalent to KRW 90,000 at the market price owned by the victim on the cafeteria-gu.

2. On November 24, 2013, Defendant A: (a) around 21:00 on November 24, 2013, Defendant A stolen the victim’s property with one pop smartphone and the victim’s property by having one gallon in a gallon of the market value of which the victim was living together on the calculation unit by using the gallon of the victim’s I operating Y located in Cheongju-si considerable area of Cheongju-si.

[2014 Highest 231]

3. Defendants’ co-principal conduct

A. The Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint property damage, etc.) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) around November 16:30, 2013, the Defendants got in front of Madao-gate operated by the victim L in K in the Chungcheongbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and confirmed the fact that the victim temporarily set out and opened the Mada-gate, and entered the said door in the order following the end of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the Mada entrance, which is the victim's possession, so that the Mada entrance could be damaged to the non-repair cost, and infringed on the above Mda entrance, which is the building managed by the victim.

B. The Defendants of special larceny, at the time, at the location, and at the location of paragraph 3(a), took out one set of money equivalent to KRW 3,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 1,300, and one pair of money equivalent to the market price of KRW 4,500, and 100,000, the market price of which was placed on the inner floor, carried out in mind, and carried out cash equivalent to KRW 18K 18K 1 and 100,000,000,000, which was placed on the inner floor.

As a result, the defendants jointly have a total of 100,000 market prices owned by the victim.